Simple, effective, and interesting

UI | UX | Web Design | Mobile Design | Respective Design

Redesigning the header and footer of a website and responsive mobile screens

Timeline

1 months

Team

CEO (Dimitri P), design manager (Chole R),

another designer (Eleanor Hinkle), UX designer/researcher(me)

Role

User Research / UI/UX Design

Tool

Figma / Google Slides / Slack / Zoom

Kanban Zone is a company that helps individuals and companies prioritize, streamline and complete their work faster without compromising the quality through proven Kanban techniques. However, the growing number of negative feedback on the header and footer of the company's website has caught the attention of stakeholders. This marked the beginning of this redesign project.


Problem

Users fail to find the useful information they need in the header and footer

Goals

1. Optimizing the existing Information Architecture and design system while keeping current clients familiar with them

2. It takes less time for current customers and new users to find what they want

3. Make the website more visually appealing while making it easier for users to use

4. Keep the mobile view consistent with the web view to avoid any confusion.

User research

Competitor analysis

Importance of call-to-action buttons

Most new users probably know very little about the Kanban tool, and a demo can help them better understand the tool and even lead to a successful purchase. For older users, it can help them see the benefits of the Kanban Zone tool compared to the current tool they are using and decide whether they want to switch to the Kanban Zone tool.

Well-organized information architecture

They provide sensible divisions and easy-to-understand categories. The solutions they can provide for different industries in different environments also help increase the satisfaction of new users.

Explanations below each term

Helping new users like me to expand fewer pages until they reach their final desired destination.

A sense of modernity and intelligence

Since the company provides collaborative and efficient tool services, it is necessary to create a sense of modernity and intelligence when users get to know the company. Other competitors either use icons or animations to add a smart feel to the site.

Complaints received from stakeholders and current clients

It’s so overwhelming!

I don’t know where to look at!

The website looks so boring.

I don't find the navigation helpful at all.

Heuristic analysis

We also performed a heuristic analysis of the current website to reveal the issues, and I discuss the detailed insights we found and solutions to those issues below.

Pain points and solutions

Restructure Information architecture

Pain points:

  • The user does not know what the product is

  • Too much content under one tab

  • Too many hierarchies confuse users

Goal:

  • Make a brief introduction

  • Reorganize the content under the tabs

  • Create better hierarchies for users to understand

Solution:

Decision 1

Add an overview section for product tab

  • Users expect to see an overview of the product under <product>

  • <overview> can help new users to know more about the product

Decision 2

Put <template> under <solutions>

  • Users are more likely to find <template> under <solutions> than <product>

  • Each tab contains less content to prevent overwhelm

Decision 3

Using icons, different font sizes, and styles to display a better hierarchy

  • Using the same color can decrease the distraction and provide a feeling of organized

  • Users can tell which is a section title and know if they are in the right place

  1. Web view

Current version

New version

Pain points:

  • Similar hierarchies make users confused

  • Too much content on a smaller screen

  • The content is different from the web version

Goal:

  • Create different hierarchies to help users understand

  • Provide less content at once

  • Make mobile view consistent with the PC view

Solution:

Decision 1

Create three different hierarchies and two arrows

  • Provide users with a clear and better hierarchy to find information efficiently

  • Different hierarchies with different arrows

Decision 2

Create an expandable menu

  • Display less information at once on mobile screens

  • Users feel less overwhelmed

Decision 3

Use the same content of information architecture

  • Prevent confusion caused (e.g. <view all features> and <All product features>)

  • Make the respective screens more consistent

2. Mobile view

Current version

New version

Pain points:

  • Too many colors applied can confuse users

  • The current design does not grab the user's attention

  • Common designs rarely show what the product does

Goal:

  • Use few colors to decrease distraction

  • Design something that catches users' attention

  • Create a unique design that shows the key features

Solution:

Decision 1

Only use three colors for <log in> <sign up>

  • Decrease the distraction

  • Two colors for the standard state, one extra color added for hover state

Decision 2

Add graphics and icons to grab the user's attention

  • Added a wave design to the background to align with the footer's new wave design and other ongoing redesign work

  • Show the key features of the product

Decision 3

Replace old text buttons with standard fill buttons

  • Kanban zone also provides services to users, so current customers may need to contact the company frequently

  • New users may want to contact the company for more details and to personalize the product

Redesign key feature - Call-to-Action button

Current Version

New Version

Change the primary color

  • We suggest Kanban Zone change the primary color to another color that has a higher contrast to white (which is their background color) to make it WCAG compliant

  • We keep it a brighter color (instead of colors that pass WCAG AAA) according to the CEO's feedback

  • We emphasize that colors should only be used with large text to pass guidelines (we also choose larger font sizes for buttons)

Current version

Pick colors that WCAG compliant

Throughout our entire design process, we test contrast and fonts when we need to pick new colors

Make the website WCAG compliant

New version

Use color styles and variants

  • It saves a lot of time when we want to make a change in colors

  • While we don't have the opportunity to work with developers, we try to talk to developers about how to make their jobs easier

  • We use variants for web menus

Color style

Use components instead of copying and pasting

  • Makes the whole design more consistent

  • Save designer’s and developer’s time

Optimizing existing design system

Variant

Make the responsive screens consistent

Pain points:

  • The colors are different

  • Hierarchy is different

  • Content is different (<See all> and <All features>)

Goal:

  • Use the same colors

  • Use the same hierarchy

  • Use the same content

Solution:

Decision 1

Make the colors, fonts, icons, and content the same

  • Mobile View now has the same hierarchy as PC View

  • Avoid any confusion among users

Decision 2

Remove graphics for call-to-action buttons on mobile screens

  • The mobile screens are smaller than desktop screens, and graphics take too much space on mobile screens

  • Most users look at the phone screen to decide if they want to dig into the product, then they use the computer to see more details

Current version

New version

Outcomes and result

Project takeaways

Although I've tried to learn the brand attributes and the company culture by browsing its website and using the tool (We were using the Kanban throughout the whole internship experience to track the work progress), I still feel that I know little about the company. As we only have a simple style guide, for example, the font and the brand color of the company, we actually have to deal with many other things, including spacing, other colors we use, font size, margin, and lots of other things. Knowing more about the company can help us to build something that more match the brand attributes.

Interactive Prototype

Back to the solution

Read the case study

34%

reduction in task completion time

50%

increased in CSAT score on the navigation system